Details » Rat Related

- Url:
- Category: Pets
- Description: a fantastic forum to be!
- Members: 142
- Created On: May 20, 2008
- Posts: 257
- Hits: 24082
- Rating: 

Post your rating:
- Rating:          
- Comment:

- Verification Image:
- Verification Code:

User Comments:
1. | Jan 21, 2014
It's great to read something that's both enjoyable and provides pramtagisdc solutions.
2. | Jan 20, 2014
SECRET。 美得不行的配乐呢。地下六英尺, 神在笑。谁不瞑目。有人在寻找, 眼神惶急声线脆弱。秘密还在不在。在不在在不在。在不在在不在。got a secret can you keep it swear this one you will saavthet lock it in your pocket take this one in your grave。
3. | Dec 14, 2013
Allowing only open carry while prohibiting cnoaecled carry is the second worst possible legal condition for the general populace - short of total prohibition on carry.This is so because if the criminal knows for sure that those without a visible gun are defenseless, he will be able to pick a defenseless victim every time.If both cnoaecled and open-carry are allowed, he will only be able to pick a defenseless victim some of the time. In that case it will be the luck of the draw, so to speak.And if no carry is allowed, then he will be able to attack anyone, because in that case every law-abiding citizen is defenseless.Of course, if he is unlucky he might run into a non-law-abiding citizen who happens to be carrying.As such, it is correct for citizens to oppose laws requiring open-carry because they force citizens to visually identify their defensibility, thus allowing the victimizer to cherry-pick his victims, and further denying those who are unwilling or unable to carry the 'virtual protection' offered by a cnoaecled-carry environment.
4. | Dec 13, 2013
Dear Professor,If the ICTY dealing with cases of comnptet against it raises questions of jurisdiction, doesn't the problem arise for the ECHR dealing with a case of freedom of expression related to an ICTY decision?Many thanks!
5. | Dec 12, 2013
contdOf course the death petnlay deters. A review of the debate.Dudley Sharp 1) Anti death petnlay folks say that the burden of proof is on those who say that the death petnlay deters. Untrue. It is a rational truism that all potential negative outcomes deter some - there is no exception. It is the burden of death petnlay opponents to prove that the death petnlay, the most severe of criminal sanctions, is the only prospect of a negative outcome that deters none. They cannot. 2) There have been 28 recent studies finding for death petnlay deterrence. A few of those have been criticized. The criticism has, itself been rebutted and/or the criticism doesn't negate no. 1 or nos. 3-10. 3) No deterrence study finds that the death petnlay deters none. They cannot. Anti death petnlay columnists Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune states, "No one argues that the death petnlay deters none." Yes, some do, But Zorn is correct, the issue is not "Does the death petnlay deter?". It does. The only issue is to what degree. 4) About 99% of those murderers who are subject to the death petnlay do everything they can to receive a lesser sentence, in pre trial, plea bargains, trial, in appeals and in clemency/commutation proceedings. Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life. No surprise. Would a more rational group, those who choose not to murder, also share in that overwhelming fear of death and be deterred by the prospects of execution? Of course. 5) There are a number of known cases of individual deterrence, those potential murderers who have stated that they were prevented from committing murder because of their fear of the death petnlay. Individual deterrence exists. 6) General deterrence exists because individual deterrence cannot exist without it. 7) Even the dean of anti death petnlay academics, Hugo Adam Bedau, agrees that the death petnlay deters .. . but he doesn't believe it deters more than a life sentence. Nos. 4-6 and 10 provide anecdotal and rational evidence that the death petnlay is a greater deterrent than a life sentence. In addition, the 28 studies finding for deterrence, find that the death petnlay is an enhanced deterrent over a life sentence. 8) All criminal sanctions deter. If you doubt that, what do you think would happen if we ended all criminal sanctions? No rational person has any doubt. Some would have us, irrationally, believe that the most severe sanction, execution, is the only sanction which doesn't deter. 9) If we execute and there is no deterrence, we have justly punished a murderer and have prevented that murderer from ever harming/murdering, again. If we execute and there is deterrence, we have those benefits, plus we have spared more innocent lives. If we don't execute and there is deterrence, we have spared murderers at the cost of more innocent deaths. 10) Overwhelmingly, people prefer life over death and fear death more than life. "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call." John McAdams - Marquette University/Department of Political Science
6. | Nov 24, 2013
etot kurginyan sladot rothschildov! ego tozhe raskrutshiwaut w Rossii dlja psewdosozialisma po trotskomu (nowi tolpolitarism) i raswala Rossii (revoluzia kak eto uzhe bilo) Info pro kurginyana na KPE.  ru !!!Dmitri Slawoljubov ..wash bibleiski projekt w rasnowidnoi forme skoro prowaliza i washa psewdowlast (kapitalism, pwsewdosozialism gde toka elita rulit a ne narod..) isbrannix balnix skoro bolshe nebudet
7. | Nov 22, 2013
There is more than 50km from any city with PD/FD or ambulance. Not a fly wehtaer for ambulance helicopter. Why you think nobody call them?And in this situation there is no possibility to help injured 'cause the may have broken bones or neck you rather kill him not help. And i such a temperatire they will be frozen in any way