Details » ..
- Url: http://basenijs.informe.com/
- Category: Pets
- Description: ..
- Members: 180
- Created On: Nov 30, 2007
- Posts: 210
- Hits: 7696
Post your rating:
Can anyone give me a list of 300 wtisbees of Quick Ad Posting without Registration ?I need list of about 300 wtisbees of Free Ad Posting without Registration but the ad posting should be very quick and fast. Thanks in advance.
Can anyone give me a list of 300 webietss of Quick Ad Posting without Registration ?I need list of about 300 webietss of Free Ad Posting without Registration but the ad posting should be very quick and fast. Thanks in advance.
Flying is a major source of pulootiln????Suppose you have three hundred people in New York who need to travel to Los Angeles. If they don't travel by Jet liner, they would all have to pile into 150 cars. Those 150 cars would burn approximately 100 gallons of gasoline each (2750 miles / 27.5 mpg) for a total of 150,000 gallons of gasoline.Furthermore, because the trip would take three days, there would be all of the energy usage associated with hotel stays, hotel laundry, electrical power consumption, meals on the road, etc. etc.Would you like to imagine what the energy costs would be to get the same 300 people to London!When you consider the whole picture, air travel is very efficient.Yes, there are alternatives. They could bicycle to Los Angeles, or take busses, but people have time constraints too.Here are some other, more attractive alternatives to combat climate change:We could seize Al Gore's 10,000 square foot mansion that consumes more energy than 20 average American homes, and use the money to further research into nuclear fusion technology.Then we could seize Al Gore's boat, that burns more fuel per hour than four family sedans, and use the money to further clean coal technology.We could also seize Al Gore's private jet that consumes more fuel flying one-way across the country than a Hummer consumes in an entire year, and use the savings to fund programs to make older homes more energy efficient.Sounds like a good start to me.
The Madison Green Fair committee reejtced my application to be a vendor at the April 29, 2010 Madison Green Fair, at which I planned to hand out free copies of a 2007 paper from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine titled “Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.” Someone speaking on behalf of the committee told me in a voicemail message that the members of the committee decided to reject my application after they read the paper. According to the voicemail message, the committee’s decision was based on the fact that the Green Fair is supposed to be about “fun” and “environmental discussion.” That reasoning is strange for two reasons. First, the paper brings us the good news that increases in levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide during the 20th and early 21st centuries “have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate.” Good news like that can certainly be called “fun.” Second, it’s absurd to say that a paper about the environmental effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is not in keeping with the theme of “environmental discussion.” Perhaps there are certain kinds of environmental discussions that the Green Fair committee is not in favor of.